Humans in Universe

6 Appendix I

6   Appendix I

1Selections from Buckminster Fuller’s ‘‘How Little I Know’’ (1966)

2 (First published in the Saturday Review, November 12, 1966, pp. 29--31, 67--70. This version is from Fuller’s And It Came to Pass Not to Stay. New York: Mac

3 millan Publishing Co., 1976.)

4 ‘‘Tell me

5 In five thousand

6 Written words’’—

7 (Equivalent, at my oral rate,

8 To three-quarters of an hour’s discourse) ‘‘What you have learned—In your lifetime,’’

9 Said Norman Cousins.

10 ‘‘That ought to be easy,’’ said I.

11 Three weeks have gone by—

12 I recall that

13 Thirty-eight years ago I invented a routine Somewhat similar to Muscle development Accomplished through A day-by-day lifting

14 Of progressively heavier weights.

15 But my new

16 Intellectual routine

17 Dealt with the weightless process Of human thought development Which subject is

18 Known to the scholars As epistemology.

19 And I have learned

20 That such words as Epistemology

21 Stop most of humanity

22 From pursuing

23 Such important considerations

24 As the development

25 Of the thought processes.

26 So my new discipline

27 Was invented for dealing

28 Even with the ephemeral Which word means

29Conceptual but weightless— As is for instance

30 The concept of circularity.

31 My new strategy required That on successive days

32 I ask myself

33 A progressively larger

34

35And more inclusive question Which must be answered

36Only in the terms of Experience.

37Hearsaids, beliefs, axioms, Superstitions, guesses, opinions Were and are

38 All excluded

39 As answer resources

40 For playing my particular Intellectual development game.

41 However, when lacking Any possible experience clues I saw that it was ineffectual To attempt to answer

42 Such questions as for instance

43 ‘‘Why I?’’

44 Or

45 ‘‘Why …

46 Anything?’’

47 And because it was my experience That some individuals

48 Proved as persistently faithful In reporting their experiences to me As were my own senses The rules of my game permitted My inclusion of such individuals’ Directly reported experiences In my inventory of experiences For use in my progressively Great and greater Self-questioned answering.

49 In playing that game

50 I soon came

51 To what I assumed to be both The largest askable and The largest answerable Question:

52 ‘‘What do you mean,’’

53 I asked myself, ‘‘By the word Universe?

54 If you can’t answer

55 In terms of

56 Direct experience You must desist From the further use Of the word UNIVERSE For, to you It will have become Meaningless!’’

57

58The 20th century physicists, In defining physical Universe As consisting only of energy, Deliberately excluded metaphysical Universe—Because the metaphysical

59Consists only of imponderables, Whereas the physical scientists Deal only with ponderables—Wherefore their physical Universe Excluded for instance

60 All our thoughts—

61 Because thoughts are weightless—

62 But thoughts are experiences—Wherefore I saw

63 That to be adequate

64 To the intuitively formulated

65 And experience-founded controls

66 Of my ever bigger

67 Question and answer routine,

68 My answering definition

69 Of UNIVERSE

70 Must be one which

71Embraced the combined

72

73Metaphysical and physical Components of UNIVERSE.

74Thus my self-formulating answer emerged, And has persisted unshattered

75 By any subsequent challenges

76 From myself or others

77 As:

78 ‘‘By Universe I mean:

79

80The aggregate of all humanity’s Consciously apprehended And communicated

81 (To self or others)

82Experiences.’’

83

84And later I discovered that Eddington had said ‘‘Science is: The conscientious attempt To set in order The facts of Experience.’’

85And I also discovered That Ernst Mach—The great Viennese physicist, Whose name is used To designate flight velocity In speed of sound increments, Known as Mach numbers—Said:

86‘‘Physics is: Experience Arranged in Most economical order.’’

87So I realized that

88Both Eddington and Mach Were seeking to put in order The same ‘‘raw materials’’ —I. e. Experiences— With which to identify Their special subsystems Of UNIVERSE.

89Wherefore I realized that All the words in all dictionaries Are the consequent tools Of all men’s conscious And conscientious attempts To communicate All their experiences—Which is of course To communicate Universe.

90There are forty-three thousand current words In the Concise Oxford Dictionary.

91 We don’t know who invented them!

92 What an enormous, anonymous inheritance!

93

94Shakespeare used ten thousand of them With which to formulate

95 His complete ‘‘works.’’

96

97It would take many more volumes Than Shakespeare’s to employ The forty-three thousand —Logically and cogently.

98 In a five thousand word article

99 I would probably have use for

100 Only one thousand.

101 Are forty-two thousand

102 Of these words

103 Superficial and extraneous

104 In reporting on

105What I have learned?

106 I have learned that

107 You would think so

108 If you ever saw a magazine’s

109 Space rewrite editor

110 At work on my work!

111 I’m not inclined to use

112 The word ‘‘Creativity’’

113 In respect to human beings;

114 What is usually spoken of as creativity

115

116Is really a unique and unprecedented Human employment of principles Which exist a priori in the Universe.

117I think man is a very extra-ordinary Part of the Universe

118 For he demonstrates unique capability In the discovery and intellectual identification Of the operative principles of Universe—Which though unconsciously employed Have not been hitherto differentiated, Isolated out and understood As being principles, By other biological species.

119 Rejecting the word ‘‘creativity’’ For use by any other than The great intellectual integrity Progressively disclosed as conceiving Both comprehensively and anticipatorily The complex interpatternings

120 Of reciprocal and transformative freedoms In pure principle

121 Which apparently govern Universe And constitute the verb god, I go along with the 5,000-year-old Philosophy of the Bhagavad-Gita Which says ‘‘Action is the product Of the qualities inherent in nature. It is only the ignorant man, Who, misled by personal egotism, Says ‘I am the doer.’ ’’ I am most impressed

122 With the earliest recorded philosophic statements By unknown individuals of India and China. Through millenniums the philosophies Have become progressively Compromised and complicated.

123 I am an explorer, however, Of the generalized design science principles Which seemingly differentiate Man from animal

124 And mind from brain.

125 The word ‘‘generalization’’ As used in the literary sense, Means ‘‘a very broad statement.’’ It suggests covering too much territory—Too thinly to be sound.

126 The literary men say ‘‘This is too general.’’

127 In the mathematical sense, The meaning of generalization Is quite different.

128 The mathematician or the physicist Looks for principles which are Persistently operative in nature, Which will hold true in every special case. If you can find principles That hold true in every case, Then you have discovered What the scientist calls A generalized principle.

129 The conscious detection of

130

131Generalized principles which hold true Under all conditions

132And their abstraction from any and all Special case experiences of the principles

  • Is probably unique to humans.
133

134By abstraction, I mean an idealized, ‘‘Empty set’’ statement

135 Such as, for instance, one of my own!

  • ‘‘Tension and compression are only coexistent’’
  • E. g., when you tense a rope

136 Its girth contracts—ergo compresses.

137

138When you compress a sphere’s polar axis, Its equatorial girth expands and tenses, It is inconceivable that a dog

139 Tugging at its leash at one time

140 And, compressing its teeth

141 On a bone at another time,

142 Should formulate consciously

143 The generalized

144 ‘‘Only coexistence of tension and compression,’’ Though the dog is subconsciously coordinate In tension-compression tactics.

145 To generalize further than

146 ‘‘Tension and compression are only coexistent,’’

147 We may say that ‘‘plus and minus

148 Only coexist’’

149 And generalize even further

150 By saying ‘‘Functions only coexist.’’

151 Then there is an even more powerful

152 And intellectually more exalted stage

153 Of generalization of principles

154 And that is the generalization

155 Of a complex of generalizations

  • Such as—unity is plural and at minimum two
  • Which combines the generalized law

156 Of the coexistence only of functions With the theory of number.

157 In turn we discover the generalizations

158 Governing the associative powers

159 Of the nucleus and of the weak interactions

160 For the unity is two

161 Of the congruent, convex and concave spheres

162 As evidenceable in the generalized laws

163 Disclosed conceptually, arithmetically, and geometrically In synergetics.

164 I am certain that what we speak of

165 As human morality

166 Is a form of tentative generalization

167 Of principles underlying

168

169Special case experiences of human potentials, Behaviors, actions, reactions and resultants. Man has also the unique ability To employ generalized principles

170 —Once recognized—

171 In a consciously selective variety

172 Of special case interrelationships.

173 The whole regenerative process

174 Of intellectual discovery

175 And specialized use of generalized principles

176 Is known as teleology.

177 Teleology embraces

178

179The theory of communication, Though as yet having special case limitations.

180 It is a hypothetical

181 Approach to pure, abstract generalization

182 To say that teleology

183Is only intuitively initiated by humans.

184 Intuition alerts brain

185 To first apprehend

186 And then recognize

187 Each special case experience

188 Within some minimum number

189 Of special case recognitions.

190 Intuition alerts mind

191 To comprehend, and

192 Formulate conceptually

193 The abstract generalization

194 Of a principle recognized

195 As operative in all the special cases.

196 Intuition alerts brain to

197

198The objectively employable generalized principle In hitherto unexperienced special case Circumstances inexplicably remote

199 From the earlier set of

200

201Special case experiences within which

202The generalized principles were first experienced Before their generalization Occurred in the mind.

203 Teleology - as part

204 Of communications theory

205 Relates to the pursuit of truth.

206 As entropy and antientropy.

207 It may be that

208 Communications theory

209 May be mathematically equated

210 With electrical

211 Transmission theory

212 Whereby the higher

213 The meaning or voltage

214 The more efficient

215 And longer distance

216 Communication attainable.

217 Based on experiments

218 With any and all systems,

219 The second law of thermodynamics

220

221Predicts the inexorable energy loss Known as ENTROPY.

222 Because the escaping energy

223 Does so diffusely,

224 In all directions,

225 Entropy is also known

226 Mathematically

227 As ‘‘The Law of Increase

228 Of the Random Element.’’

229 Before it had been discovered

230 By rigorous experimentation

231 That light has a velocity

232 It was erroneously assumed

233 To be ‘‘self-evident’’

234

235That light was instantaneous - That all stars in the sky Were ‘‘right there now’’ In exact geometrical pattern, Being seen instantaneously And simultaneously

236By all who looked their way.

237But since Michelson’s measurement Of light’s speed We have learned that The light from the Sun, Our nearest star, Takes eight minutes To reach us here on Earth. From our next nearest star Light takes two years To reach our planet Earth. And other stars Are so far away Their light takes millions Of years and more To reach us.

238Assuming instant-Universe Classical Newtonian science Also assumed that Universe Must be an instant system—A simultaneous unit machine, In which every part Must be affecting Every other part, In varying degrees But in simultaneous unity. They assumed also that the Unit and simultaneous universe

239Must of course obey

240The great second law

241Of thermodynamics Whose, inexorable, Entropic energy loss Required self-dissipation And ultimately utter Self-annihilation

242 Of Universe.

243

244‘‘Running down’’ they called it Wherever ‘‘down’’ may be.

245 Though light’s speed

246

247Of seven hundred million miles per hour Is fast

248 It isn’t anywhere nearly as fast

249 As ‘‘instant’’—

250

251Which means reaching anywhere ‘‘In no time at all.’’

252Ergo, the Einsteinians Instituted experiments To ascertain the behavioral characteristics Of a physical universe comprised Of only partially overlapping, Progressively intertransforming, Nonsimultaneous, energy events.

253The Einsteinian Era scientists’ experiments Showed that entropic energies Accomplished their disassociations here Only through associations there - That is by regrouping elsewhere. Thus early 20th-century scientists Found the intertransformative Energy quanta transactions, To be eventually,

254But not always immediately, One hundred percent accountable.

255 As a consequence of

256 The Einsteinians’ experiments

257

258The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries’ Concept of a continually

259 Self-dissipating universe

260 Had to be abandoned

261 And in its place was established

262 The, experimentally required,

263 Law of Conservation of Energy

264 Which states that energy

265 May be neither created nor lost;

266 Ergo the energetic Universe

267 Is the minimum,

268 But nonsimultaneously realized,

269

270Energy exchanging system, Which is to say

271That physical Universe,

272 As experimentally demonstrated

273 Is the minimum and only

274 Perpetual motion process,

275

276Which as an aggregate of finite, Dissimilar and nonsimultaneous Energy events

277 Is in itself

278 Sum totally finite.

279 All the foregoing

280 Dissipates the foundations

281 Of the Newtonian world’s

282 Cosmogony and economics

283 Which assumed

284

285That a ‘‘running down world’’ Suggested the prudence

286 Of saving, conserving and hoarding;

287

288And that those who spent Were fools who would perish As resources dwindled.

289Though entropically irreversible Every action

290Has its reaction and resultant, And every nuclear component Has its positive or negative Behavioral opposite Which is however

291Not its mirror image.

292And the irreversible situations Give an evolutionary direction To otherwise stalemated Conditions of physical Universe.

293For instance it is discovered That wealth, whatever else it may be, Cannot alter an iota of yesterday And can alter only The present and forward Metabolic regeneration Conditions of humanity.

294Song of the Dead And the Quick—Newton was a noun And Einstein is a verb. Einstein’s norm makes Newton’s norm INSTANT UNIVERSE, Absurd.

295‘‘A body persists In a state of rest Or—

296Except as affected—’’ Thus grave stones are erected!

297 Nonsimultaneous, physical Universe Is Energy; and ‘‘Energy equals mass Times the second power

298 Of the speed of light.’’ No exceptions!

299 Fission verified Einstein’s hypothesis—Change is normal

300 Thank you Albert!

301 Irreversible verse. Einstein’s intellect

302 Defined energy as E = me2Energy cannot define intellect.

303 Intellect the metaphysical Is comprehensive to Energy the physical.

304 While Universe is finite Energy is definite Because definable Energy is XY.

305 Intellect is O.

306 The wealth of Earthians Is irreversible.

307 Wealth cannot alter yesterday’s experience.

308 It can only alter today’s and tomorrow’s experiences. It can buy

309 Forward time in which intellect May scientifically explore for The orderly interrelationships

310 Disclosed in yesterday’s experiences Which can be employed by intellect To forecast

311 Anticipatory and orderly rearrangements of tomorrow By technological transformations Of the physical energy environments, Events and circumstances.

312 Wealth is the organized and operative

313 Tools and energy capability

314 To sustain man’s forward metabolic regeneration;

315 To physically protect him;

316 To increase his knowledge

317 And degrees of freedom

318 While decreasing his interfrustrations.

319 Solo wealth is to commonwealth

320 As X is to X4.

321 Wealth is: Energy compounded With intellect’s know-how.

322 Every time man uses his know-how

323 His experience increases

324 And his intellectual advantage

325 Automatically increases.

326 Because of its conservation

327 Energy cannot decrease.

328 Know-how can only increase.

329 It is therefore scientifically clear

330 That:—wealth which combines

331 Energy and intellect

332 Can only increase, and that wealth can

333 Increase only with use

334 And that wealth increases As fast as it is used.

335 The faster—the more!

336 Wealth is accountable as

337 The inanimate energies shunted

338 Onto the ends of industrial levers

339 Whose physical capability is

340 Stateable in forward, automated,

341 Man days of travel miles

342 With first class comprehensive services

343 Including food, lodging, clothing,

344 Amusements, communication, information

345 And medical services

346

347Based on the average physical experiences Of a top civil service rating’s World travel involvements.

348Has man a function

349In Universe?

350In dynamical balance With the inside-outing, Expanding universe Of radiant stars, Man witnesses

351Radiantly dormant Earth as A collecting or outside-inning, Contracting phase, of Universe. Earth receives and stores, A continually increasing inventory Of sun and star emanating radiation In its lethal-energy-concentrates Sifting, sorting and accumulating Spherical Van Allen belts.

352In addition to the Van Allen belts The succession of Earth’s concentric Spherical mantles, e. g., The ionosphere, troposphere et al., Constitute an extraordinary series Of discrete filters for

353The random-to-orderly sorting, Shunting, partially accumulating And final inwardly forwarding Of the benign radiation residues To the biosphere stage Of Earth’s continual and orderly Processing of its discrete share Of the expanding-Universe-propagated Energy income receipts.

354 Earth also receives daily

355 Additional thousands of tons

356

357Of expanding-Universe-dispatched Stardust.

358 This concentration around Earth’s surface

359 Of the Universe-deposited dust

360

361Apparently consists of 91 of the 92 regeneratively patterning

362 Chemical elements

363

364In approximately the same systematic order Of relative abundance of those elements

365As the relative abundance

366Of those same elements

367 As they are found to occur

368 In the thus far inventoried

369 Reaches of Universe.

370 The biological life on earth

371 Is inherently antientropic

372 For it negotiates the chemical sorting

373 Out of the Earth’s crust’s

374 Chemical elements inventory

375 And rearranges the atoms

376 In elegantly ordered

377 Molecular compound patternings.

378 Of all the biological antientropics,

379 I. e. random-to-orderly arrangers,

380 Man’s intellect is by much

381

382The most active, exquisite and effective agent Thus far in evidence in Universe.

383Through intellect, man constantly succeeds

384 In inventing technological means

385 Of doing ever more orderly

386 I. e., more efficient,

387 ‘‘Better sorted-out,’’

388 Local Universe, energy tasks

389 With ever less units of investments

390

391Of the (what may be only apparently), ‘‘Randomly’’ occurring

392 Resources of energy,

393 As atomic matter,

394 Or energy as channeled electromagnetics.

395 To guarantee

396 All of life’s

397 Antientropic functioning,

398 Intellectual integrity Universe

399

400Which has designedly arranged the great game Has also arranged that mankind, Like all the other living species, Has its ultra-shortsighted, Built-in, ‘‘desire’’ drives,

401Its romantic conception ambitions And protectively colored self deceits, As well as its longer distance ‘‘needs,’’ All of which cause each species To pursue its particular ‘‘honey’’ With its particular rose-colored glasses, As does the bumblebee Which at the same time

402Inadvertently and unconsciously performs Myriads of other tasks, Designed with fabulous

403Scientific capability by nature,

404Which inadvertent interco-ordinate tasks Unknown to the separate creature species Are all essential to realization Of the regenerative continuance Of the much larger

405Survival support conditions For the generalized

406Ecological system of ‘‘all life.’’

407 It is part of

408

409The comprehensively anticipating, Design science of life

410That the bumblebee’s self-unviewed, Unwitting, bumbling tail

411Bumps into and knocks off male pollen, Which it later

412And again inadvertently,

413Knocks off upon the female botanical organs, Thus unconsciously participating in A vastly complex ecological interaction Of the many energy processing Bio-chemical ‘‘gears’’ Of the total life system Dynamically constituted by All the living species.

414The myriad inadvertencies Of all the living species Have sum totally provided A metabolically sustaining And regenerative topsoil process Which—it is realized now, But only by

415Our retrospectively gained knowledge—

416Has kept man

417Regeneratively alive on Earth For at least two million years, While ever improving His physical survival advantages And increasing his longevity.

418This vast ‘‘game playing’’ of life Has also indirectly occasioned Not only the regenerative multiplication Of human beings,

419But also a progressively increasing Percentage who survive in conditions Of ever improving Physical advantage.

420I think man is very properly concerned About that which he does not understand.

421I don’t think that it is the machine per se That bothers man;

422 It is just not understanding

423 Anything

424 That disturbs him.

425 When an accident bares

426

427Portions of human organs Familiar only to doctors, Those organs look foreign And frightening to people. Stick your tongue way out Before a mirror.

428 It is a strange looking device.

429 If existing originally and

430

431Transcendentally as psyches only, Individuals had to choose, And assemble their own sets Of organic parts,

432Having been assured of mortal incarnation And of mortal ‘‘honey chasing’’ experiences But only after successful selection And completion of the assembly—And were endowed—as psyches—Only with an aesthetic Sense of selectivity,

433Being devoid of any understanding Of either the separate or integrated Functions of those parts—No humans would merger

434Those co-operatively functioning parts Into mortal beings

435 For no part of the ‘‘guts’’

436 Would be chosen.

437

438Nature had to skin over the regenerative Chemistry and physics controls, With an aesthetically intriguing, Pseudo-static, sculptural baby doll unity In order to trick the immortal psyches Into the problem-beset,

439Temporary occupation

440Of such humid process regenerative machines As those of the humans.

441I have learned

442That man knows little

443And thinks he knows a lot.

444I am the most unlearned man I know.

445I don’t know anyone

446Who has learned

447How little one knows

448As have I.

449But that does not belittle

450The little I seem to know,

451And I have confidence

452In the importance of remembering

453How little we know

454And of the possible significance Of the fact that we prosper, And at sometimes even enjoy Life in Universe

455Despite the designed-in littleness That we have to ‘‘get by with.’’

456 What the astronomers rank as

457 The nearest bright star to Earth

458 Is ‘‘Rigel Kent’’

459

460Which is three hundred thousand times Further away from earth than is the Sun. It is easy to see a man

461 One third of a mile away and

462 We were surprised when young

463 To see a man

464 At that distance

465 Swinging a sledge

466 To drive a post into the ground

467 And to realize

468 That the sound of his maul

469 Hitting the post top

470 Registered in our brain

471 As reported through the ears

472 Four seconds later

473 Than had the visual news

474 Which ‘‘long since’’ had told us

475 That he had once more

476 Hit the post.

477 Through physical experiments

478

479Performed by our scientists

480We have learned that

481The highest known velocity

482Among physical phenomena

483Is the speed of light and all radiation Relayingly scanned by nerve lines To our brain’s television conceptualizing Through the optics of our eyes.

484 Because the speed of light

485

486Is approximately 186,000 miles per second, And the Moon is

487About twice that distance Away from Earth.

488 If we had a large mirror on the Moon,

489 And we flashed a powerful

490 Light toward the Moon

491 It would take four seconds

492 For the light to be reflected back

493 To our eyes.

494 That is, the light takes

495 Two seconds to get to the Moon

496 And two more seconds

497 To return to Earth.

498 And the overall four seconds lag

499 Of the visual report

500 Is the same time lag as that in

501 Our childhood realized lag

502 Of the sound report

503 Behind the visual report

504 Of the post-sledging event.

505 Because the light coming to Earth

506 From the Moon

507 Takes two seconds to make the trip,

508 And because the light

509 Coming to Earth from the Sun

510 Takes eight and one-half minutes,

511 And because the light coming to us from Rigel Kent

512 Takes four and one-half years,

513 We all see a live show

514 Taking place in the sky

515 Four and one-half

516 Years ago.

517 And as we gaze around

518 The starry heavens

519 We see right now

520 Live shows of ‘‘yesterdays’’

521 Ranging from millions to sextillions of years ago,

522 As we look at the stars

523 We see all of history

524 Now alive.

525

526It took only two million years and Four and one-half billion human babies To establish a human survival beachhead Aboard the little Eight-thousand-mile-diameter Spherical Spaceship EARTH

527Whereby life could successfully realize Its highest known potential life span Possibly to continue indefinitely As one self-rejuvenation generation. Few of the stars we look at, Live-starring out there, Are young enough To witness

528 Those first human events

529 Taking place on Earth

530 Only two millions of years ago.

531

532Since all the vital parts Of human organisms Have now become interchangeable, And many of them

533Have also become interchangeable With inanimate mechanical parts, And since human longevity Is continually increasing There is a good possibility That humanity is developing A continuous human

534 Who will persist in prime health

535 And youthful vigor.

536

537With the lessening of need To replenish the population With fresh baby starts,

538The built-in drives to procreate Will lessen and be manifest in a proclivity Of females to camouflage as male And males to camouflage as female Thus suppressing the procreative urge By superficial antipathetic illusions, While permitting and promoting Procreatively innocuous sex companionships.

539Despite their billionfold numbers Babies and very young children Soon after their arrival on earth Have uttered and continue to utter Spontaneous comments and questions—Concerning life on Earth And in Universe—

540Which are so economical And uniquely fresh

541In viewpoint and formulation

542As to be pure poetry Apparently proving that Poetry is inexhaustible;

543To which their sophisticated

544And surprised off-guard adult audience Cliche unpoetically ‘‘Oh how cute.’’

545In the year 1964

546The one hundred largest Industrial giant corporations, Born and reared

547In the United States of America Invested four out of five

548Of their new plant and equipment Expansion dollars

549In production and service facilities In world lands outside the U.S.A.

550 This trending to World identity only

551 Of the industrial giants

552 Held true also not only with thousands

553 Of lesser magnitude

554 U.S.A, and European born

555 Limited liability industrial organizations

556 But also with the Communist countries’

557 Giant industrial organizations.

558 Wherefore world industrialization trends swiftly—

559 And altogether transcendentally

560 To man’s conscious planning—

561 Into an unitarily co-ordinate

562 World giant

563 With built-in automated,

564 Research fed,

565 Computer analyzed and selected,

566 Evolutionary self-improving

567 And self-transforming

568 Through alternatingly regenerated

569 Competitive precessioning

570

571Of all the variable functions Of general systems theory.

572 TRUTH

573 I have learned that truth

574 Is an omnipresent, omnidirectional,

575 Evolutionary awareness,

576

577One of whose myriadly multiplying facets Discloses that there are no ‘‘absolutes’’ -No ‘‘ends in themselves’’—no ‘‘things’’ -Only transitionally transformative verbing.

578 It seems possible to me

579

580That God may be recognizable In man’s limited intellection

581 Only as the weightless passion drive

582

583Which inspires our progressive searching For the—momentarily only -

584And only most-truthful-thus-far-possible—Comprehension of all the interconnections

585 Of all experiences.

586 It seems then to me

587

588That the nearer we come to understanding, The nearer we come to the

589 Orderly omni-interrelationships

590 Of all the weightless complex

591 Of all generalized principles

592 Which seem to be disclosed to us

593 As so important

594 As to be tentatively identified as God.

595

596For it is the integratable interrelationships Of all the generalized laws

597Which apparently govern

598The great verb ‘‘Universe’’

599 Of the vastly greater

600

601—Because comprehensively anticipatory - Verb intellecting

602Which verb of optimum understanding May be ‘‘God’’.

603 It seems that Truth

604 Is progressive approximation

605 In which the relative fraction

606

607Of our spontaneously tolerated residual error Constantly diminishes.

608 This is a typical

609

610Antientropy proclivity of man—Entropy being the law

611 Of increase of the random element.

612

613Heisenberg’s indeterminism, In which the act of measuring Always alters the measured, Would seem entropic were it not For the experimentally realized knowledge That the successive alterations Of the observed Diminish

614As both our tooling and instrumentation Continually improve;

615Ergo intellection’s effect

616Upon measurement and the measured

617Is a gap closing,

618And the pursuit of more truthful comprehension Is successfully antientropic.

619Before Heisenberg, T. S. Eliot said, ‘‘Examination of history alters history’’ And Ezra Pound,

620 And even earlier poets,

621 Reported their discoveries

622

623That in one way or another The act of thinking alters thought itself.

624 When we ask ourself

625 ‘‘What have we learned?’’

626 We feel at first

627 That the answer is ‘‘nothing.’’

628

629But as soon as we say so We recall exceptions.

630For instance we have learned

631To test experimentally

632 The axioms given to us

633 As ‘‘educational’’ springboards, and

634 We have found

635

636That most of the ‘‘springboards’’ Do not spring

637 And some never existed.

638

639As for instance Points, holes, Solids, surfaces, Straight lines, planes, ‘‘Instantaneous,’’ ‘‘simultaneous,’’

640Things, nouns, ‘‘Up,’’ ‘‘down,’’ ‘‘at rest’’

641The words ‘‘artificial’’ and ‘‘failure’’ Are all meaningless.

642For what they aver

643Is experimentally ‘‘non-existent.’’

644If nature permits a formulation It is natural.

645If nature’s laws of behavior Do not permit formulation The latter does not occur. Whatever can be done Is natural,

646No matter how grotesque, boring, Unfamiliar or unprecedented.

647 In the same way

648 Nature never ‘‘fails.’’

649

650Nature complies with her own laws. Nature is the law.

651When man lacks understanding Of nature’s laws

652And a man-contrived structure Buckles unexpectedly, It does not fail.

653It only demonstrates that man Did not understand

654Nature’s laws and behaviors. Nothing failed.

655Man’s knowledge or estimating Was inadequate.

656The second law of thermodynamics—Entropy—is also as we have learned The law of increase of the Random Element I. e., every system loses energy—but Synergy means

657 Behavior of whole systems

658 Unpredicted by

659 The behavior of any separate part.

660 EN-ergy behaves entropically.

661 SYN-ergy behaves syntropically.

662 God is entropy

663 And God is syntropy,

664 God is synergy.

665 God is energy.

666 And God is always

667 A verb—

668

669The verbing of Integrity.

670I assume that the physical Universe is definite And the metaphysical Universe is finite.

671 What men have called infinite

672 I call finite

673 And what men called finite

674 I call definite—i.e., definitive.

675 By my philosophy

676 The finite, but imponderable

677 Metaphysical Universe

678

679Embraces the definite, Ponderable, physical Universe. Finite is not unitarily conceptual. Definite is unitarily conceptual.

680 I have mathematical proof

681 That the difference between the sums

682 Of all the angles around all the surface vertices

683 Of any conceptual, definitive physical system

684 And the finite but non-conceptual metaphysical universe

685 Is always 720 degrees

686 Or a difference of only one

687Definitive tetrahedron,

688 Therefore, the combined

689 Physical and metaphysical Universe is finite.

690 You can’t buy anything worthwhile

691 Like spontaneous love or understanding.

692 Though metaphysically finite

693 These are imponderables.

694 The absolute would be

695 Nontransformable, static and weighable.

696 Ergo, experimentally meaningless.

697 Infinity is only local

698 And occurs within definite systems,

699 As for instance

700 Following a great circle

701 Around a sphere

702 Which because of the fact

703 That lines—

704 Which occur experimentally

705 Only as energy vectors—

706 Cannot go through

707 The same point

708 At the same time—

709 Due to interference,

710 Which means also that lines

711 As curves

712 Cannot re-enter, or

713 ‘‘Join back into themselves,’’

714 Therefore, the circling line

715 Can only wrap around

716 And over its earlier part—

717 As the knot-making

718 Sailor says it,

719 The circle when followed

720 Around and around

721 Results in a coil

722 Which is an endless scenario—

723 An asymmetric spiral,

724 Which may be followed experimentally

725 Only as long as intellect is interested.

726 Not being simultaneous

727 Universe cannot consist of one function.

728 Functions only coexist.

729 Universe while finite is not definable.

730 I can define many of its parts

731 But I cannot define simultaneously

732 The nonsimultaneously occurring

733 Aggregate of partially overlapping experiences

734 Whose total set of local scenario relationships

735 Constitutes the whole Universe

736 Though the latter as an aggregate of finites

737 Is finite.

738 All the words

739 In all the dictionaries, as noted before,

740 Represent all of humanity’s attempts

741 To express the aggregate of experiences—Universe.

742 And while the dictionaries are finite

743 All the words

744 In all the dictionaries

745 Cannot be read simultaneously

746 And there is not one

747 Simultaneous sentence

748 Inherent and readable

749 In all the words.

750 In the same way

751 All the nonsimultaneous experiences

752 May not be conceived

753 And expressed as

754 A simultaneous system.

755 Ergo, there is no thinkable and logical Simultaneous conception

756 Of nonsimultaneous Universe.

757 There is strong awareness

758 That we have been overproducing

759 The army of rigorously disciplined

760 Scientific, game playing, academic specialists Who through hard work

761 And suppressed imagination

762 Earn their Ph. D.s

763 And automatic contracts

764 With prime contractors

765 At fifteen thousand dollars

766 Per year—and more—

767 Only to have their specialized field

768 Become obsolete and by-passed in five years, By severely altered techniques, instruments And exploratory stratagems.

769 Despite their honor grades

770 They prove not to be

771 The Natural Philosophers

772 And scientist-artists, implied by their Ph. D.s But just deluxe quality Technicians or mechanics.

773 And a myriad

774 Of emergency committees—

775 Multiplying swiftly

776 From one or two

777 Emergency Committees

778 Appointed by the President,

779 Have altogether discovered

780 That what the

781 Ph. D. scientists lack -

782 To adapt themselves to change

783 Has been officially pronounced to be

784 ‘‘Creativity,’’

785 But to my thinking

786 They lack the unique capability of mind—

787 Which is the ability not only to generalize

788 And to integrate a complex

789 Of pure generalizations

790 But also to project teleologically—

791 With fundamental understanding—

792 In any special case direction.

793 Fundamental wisdom

794 Can readily identify any and all

795 Special case aspects within

796 The generalized whole

797 When listening

798 Sensitively to one’s intuitions

799 By which alone

800 The generalized sub-subconscious integration

801 Of pattern cognition feedbacks

802 Are articulated.

803 Philip Morrison—Cornell’s head

804 Of the department of nuclear physics—

805 Talks about what he calls

806 ‘‘Left-hand’’ and ‘‘right-hand’’ sciences.

807 Right-hand science deals in all the proven

808 Scientific formulas and experiments.

809 Left-hand science deals in

810 All of the as yet unknown or unproven—

811 That is: With all it is going to take

812 Intellectually, intuitively, speculatively, imaginatively

813 And even mystically

814 By inspired persistence

815 To open up the as yet unknown.

816 The great scientists were great

817 Because they were the ones

818 Who dealt successfully with the unknown. All the ‘‘greats’’ were left-hand scientists.

819 Despite this historical patterning of the ‘‘greats’’ We have government underwriting Only the right-hand science, Making it bigger and sharper,

820 Rather than more inclusive and understanding*.— For how could Congress justify Appropriations of billions for dreams?

821 So the billions went only For the swiftly obsoleting

822 Bigger, faster and more incisive

823 Modifications of yesterday’s certainties, By Ph. D. specialists Guaranteed by the great Institutes of Technology To which the Congress Allocated the training funds As obviously ‘‘safe’’ .

824 And exempt from political criticism;

825 Despite that scientific investigation Had shown beyond doubt That almost all of America’s Top performance scientists Had been educated

826 In small, liberal arts colleges, And that almost all Of those top scientists Attributed their success To their good fortune In having studied intimately With a great inspiring teacher. It woud be considered Political madness

827 To risk charges of corruption

828 Through voting government funds

829 To any individual

830

831Especially to ‘‘great inspiring teachers’’—‘‘Crackpot longhairs!’’

832 So it goes—

833 To hell with the facts

834 When re-election

835 To political office is at stake.

836

837Everything that constitutes science Is unteachable.

838 And we recall that

839 Eddington said: ‘‘Science

840 Is the earnest attempt

841 Of individual initiative

842 To set in order

843 The facts of experience.’’

844

845Scientific routines for specialized technicians And scientific formulas for their reference Alone are teachable. Initiative is unteachable.

846Because we have been governmentally fostering Ony right-hand science and Right-hand science to excess

847 The U.S.A. President’s science advisor

848 Instituted last year (1965)

849 A new direction of search

850 For sources of so-called ‘‘creativity.’’

851

852Financed by the National Academy of Sciences, He asked New York University’s art department To bring together a representative group of America’s leading art educators and artists.

853It was felt by the National Academy That the art educators—As those who dealt with

854 Most of the almost drop-outs

855 Who had been switched into art

856 As a ‘‘last resort’’—

857 Were probably intimate

858 With the type of emerging youth

859 Who were allowed to remain

860 In a freer state of mind

861 —In the world of art —

862 Than would they have been

863 If disciplined rigorously

864 In sharp specialization by the sciences.

865 That meeting I thought fascinating

866 For it disclosed the artists as being

867 Individuals who develop powerful self-protection

868 Of their innate intellectual

869 And conceptual capability inheritance.

870 They often protect their innate capabilities

871 Through intuitively triggered poker-faced silence

872 Which in the elementary or high schools

873 Is interpreted as non-cooperative, mental inferiority, Often causing early termination

874 Of their formal education.

875 I think the consensus

876 Of the New York University meeting

877 Was that individuals

878 Of original conceptual brilliance

879 Were most frequently

880 Detected, protected, and made to grow By equally sensitive art teachers.

881 ‘‘Great teachers.’’

882 Which agrees elegantly

883 With the statements

884 Of the proven scientists

885 Regarding their own experiences.

886 Congressional appropriations committees Please take notice!

887 To comprehend the integral of art and science As an irrepressible, intuitive creative urgency—As an artist’s need to articulate—

888 Kepes at Massachusetts Institute of Technology Made a beautiful demonstration.

889 He took hundreds of 8’’ x 10’’

890 Black-and-white photographs

891 Of modern paintings and mixed them thoroughly Like shuffled cards

892 With photographs taken by scientists

893 Through microscopes or telescopes

894 Of all manner of natural phenomena Sound waves, chromosomes and such.

895 The only way you can classify

896 Photographs with nothing recognizable in them

897 Is by your own spontaneous Pattern classifications.

898 Group the mealy, the blotchy, the striped,

899 The swirly, the polka-dotted, and their sub-combinations.

900 The pattern classified groups Of photographs were displayed.

901 The artists’ work and the scientists’

902 Were indistinguishable.

903 Checking the back-mounted data, it was found

904 That the artist had frequently conceived

905 The imagined pattern before

906 The scientist found it in nature.

907 Science began to take A new view of artists.

908 Loving mothers

909 Prohibit here and promote there—

910 Often in ways irrelevant or frustrating To brain-coordinated genetic evolution,

911 Often suppressing

912 A child’s profound contribution Trying to emerge.

913 We have to look on our society

914

915As we look on the biological world in general Recognizing, for instance,

916 The extraordinary contributions

917 Of the fungi, the manures, the worms, et al.— In the chemical reprocessing—And fertility up-grading of the earth.

918 We must learn to think

919 Of the functions of the trees’ roots

920 As being of equal importance To the leaves’ functions.

921 We tend to applaud

922 Only the flower and the fruit

923 Just as we applaud only the football player

924 Who makes the touchdown

925 And not the linemen

926 Who opened the way.

927 What society applauds as ‘‘creative’’

928 Is often isolated

929 Out of an extraordinary set Of co-equal evolutionary events, Most of which are invisible.

930 Evolutionary ‘‘touchdowns’’ are unpredictable—Sometimes centuries apart.

931 Who knows which child

932 is to make the next breakthrough?

933 In the next decade society

934

935Is going to be preoccupied with the child Because through the behavioral sciences And electrical exploration of the brain We find that given the right environment And thoughtful answers to its questions The child has everything it needs educationally Right from birth.

936 We have thought erroneously of education

937 As the mature wisdom

938 And over-brimming knowledge of the grownups

939 Injected by the discipline pump

940 Into the otherwise ‘‘empty’’ child’s head.

941 Sometimes parents say ‘‘don’t’’

942 Because they want to protect the child

943 From getting into trouble.

944 At other times when they fail to say ‘‘no’’

945 The child gets into trouble.

946 The child, frustrated, stops exploring.

947 It is possible to design environments

948 Within which the child will be

949 Neither frustrated nor hurt

950 Yet free to self-educate, spontaneously and fully

951 Without trespassing on others.

952 I have learned to undertake

953 Reform of the environment

954 And not to try to reform man.

955If we design the environment properly

956 It will permit both child and adult to develop safely And to behave logically.

957 Order is achieved through—positive and negative—

958 Magnitude and frequency controlled alteration

959 Of the successive steering angles.

960 We move by zigzagging control

961 From one phase of physical Universe evolution to another.

962 The rudder concept of social law is most apt.

963 The late Norbert Wiener chose the word cybernetics

964 Derived from Greek roots of ‘‘rudder’’

965 Because Wiener, Shannon and others

966 in communication theory

967 Were exploring human behaviors

968 And their brain-controlled ‘‘feedback,’’ etc.,

969 As a basis for the design of computers—

970 And it became evident

971 That the human brain only waveringly

972 Steers man through constant change.

973 No sharp cleavage is found

974 Which identifies the boundary between life and non-life,

975 Between the heretofore so-called ‘‘animate’’ and ‘‘inanimate.’’

976 Viruses,

977 The smallest organized structures

978 Exhibiting ‘‘life,’’

979 May be classified either

980 As inanimate or animate -

981 As crystalline or ‘‘cellular’’ forms.

982 This is the level also at which

983 The DNA-RNA genetic code serves as

984 An angle and frequency designed

985 Structural pattern integrity.

986 Such pattern integrities

987 Are strictly accountable

988 Only as mathematical principles

989 Pattern integrities are found

990 At all levels of structural organization in Universe.

991 The DNA-RNA is a specialized case

992 Of the generalized principle of pattern integrity

993 Found throughout life and non-life.

994 All pattern integrity design

995 Is controlled entirely and only by

996 Angle and frequency modulation.

997 The biological corpus

998 Is not strictly ‘‘animate’’ at any point.

999 Given that the ‘‘ordering’’

1000 Of the corpus design

1001 Is accomplished through such codings as DNA-RNA Which are exclusively angle and frequency modulation.

1002 Then we may go on to suggest

1003

1004That ‘‘life,’’ as we customarily define it Could be effected at a distance.

1005Precession is the effect Of one moving system Upon another moving system. Precession always produces

1006Angular changes of the movements Of the effected bodies and

1007At angles other than 180 degrees, That is, the results are never Continuance in a straight line. Ergo all bodies of Universe Are effecting the other bodies

1008 In varying degrees

1009 And all the intergravitational effects

1010 Are precessionally angular modulations And all the interradiation effects Are frequency modulations.

1011 The gravitational and radiation effects Could modulate the DNA-RNA Angle and frequency instructions At astronomical remoteness—Life could be ‘‘sent on.’’

1012 Within the order of evolution as usually drawn Life ‘‘occurred’’ as a series

1013 Of fortuitous probabilities in the primeval sea. It could have been sent or ‘‘radiated’’ there. That is, the prime code

1014 Or angle and frequency modulated signal Could have been transmitted From a remote stellar location.

1015 It seems more likely

1016

1017(In view of the continuous rediscovery of humans As fully organized beings

1018At ever more remote historical periods) That the inanimate structural pattern integrity, Which we call human being, Was a frequency modulated code message Beamed at Earth from remote location.

1019Man as prime organizing ‘‘Principle’’ construct pattern integrity Was radiated here from the stars - Not as primal cell, but as

1020A fully articulated high order being, Possibly as the synergetic totality Of all the gravitation And radiation effects

1021 Of all the stars

1022 In our galaxy

1023 And from all the adjacent galaxies

1024 With some weak effects

1025 And some strong effects

1026 And from all time.

1027

1028And pattern itself being weightless, The life integrities are apparently Inherently immortal.

1029 You and I

1030 Are essential functions

1031 Of Universe

1032 We are exquisite syntropy.

1033 I’ll be seeing you!

1034 Forever.